Are Age Checks Becoming the New Baseline for Childrens Platforms?
Weve been watching the child-safety conversation shift quickly. Ofcoms new report says age checks are now being deployed at unprecedented scale, while also making clear that the job is still unfinished and tech companies need to strengthen protections across the wider system (Ofcom). Roblox has also pushed facial age checks deeper into communication, tying chat access to age-grouped controls rather than a simple self-declared date of birth (Roblox). In parallel, the EU is openly weighing tighter age restrictions for children on social media, which tells you this debate is no longer sitting at the edge of the industry (AP).
From a software development point of view, that is the interesting shift. Age checks are starting to look like a product primitive, alongside feeds, messaging and account controls. Once that happens, the real design question changes. No longer are we asking whether a platform has an age gate. Rather, we are asking what happens after the gate opens, who can message whom, what gets recommended, how links behave, what reporting looks like, and how much friction families will tolerate before the product becomes awkward to use.
Ofcoms report is useful because it pushes beyond a checkbox mindset. It treats age assurance as one part of a wider model that also needs moderation, safer defaults, and support from app stores and device makers. That feels like the right direction. One control can help. One control rarely carries the load on its own.
The Roblox story shows how quickly trust can be damaged when the surrounding architecture is weak. The Los Angeles County lawsuit alleges that children were exposed to grooming and exploitative behaviour despite public assurances about safety (LA County). Whatever happens in court, the message for platform builders is hard to miss. If a child-facing product depends mainly on user goodwill, it will struggle under real scale.
At oodlü, we keep coming back to the same base concern. If children and adults share an open world, what has to be built in from day one? For us, that means adult-created groups, child interaction inside groups only, cross-group connection only when both adults actively agree through real-world contact, and communication that is restricted by architecture rather than hope. We are still building, and we are still learning, but the direction of travel is clear.
The wider industry seems to be arriving at a similar place. Age assurance is becoming part of the baseline. The harder question is what else belongs there, and how you keep the experience usable for families while closing off easy abuse routes.
What do you think belongs in the baseline for a children's platform?
We'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Find us on the social channels linked at the top of the page.